Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Which device is more accurate to determine the stability/mobility of dental implants? A human cadaver study

Identifieur interne : 004F24 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004F23; suivant : 004F25

Which device is more accurate to determine the stability/mobility of dental implants? A human cadaver study

Auteurs : T. F. Tözüm ; B. T. Bal [Turquie] ; I. Turkyilmaz [États-Unis] ; G. Gülay [Turquie] ; I. Tulunoglu [Turquie]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:CCE43D8B9262749CDB44695088B5E685C44082C0

English descriptors

Abstract

Summary  Non‐invasive devices including resonance frequency (RF) analysis and mobility measuring (MM) damping capacity assessment are used to measure implant stability/mobility. The aims of the study were to compare the primary stability of implant inserted into extraction sockets by using RF with cable, RF wireless and new wireless MM device, to clarify the relation between these devices and to understand the correlations between peri‐implant bone levels and implant stability. A total of 30 screw‐type implants (3·75 × 11 and 4·2 × 11 mm) were inserted into extraction sockets of eight mandibular pre‐molar regions of human cadavers. The primary stability of implants was measured by three devices after insertion. Peri‐implant vertical defects were created in millimetre increments ranging between 0 and 5 mm, and stability/mobility of implants were analysed. At placement, the mean implant stability quotient of RF with cable, RF wireless and MM device values was 46 ± 1, 57·8 ± 9 and −5·4 ± 1, respectively. Statistical correlations were demonstrated between these devices (P = 0·001). Statistically significant differences were presented for all peri‐implant detects ranging between 0 and 5 mm for RF with cable and RF wireless at all increments. However, only a significant decrease was found between 0 and 1 mm defects, and 4 and 5 mm defects in MM device. Although RF with cable and RF wireless seem to be suitable to detect peri‐implant bone loss around implants in 1 mm increments, the new MM device may not be suitable to detect the 1 mm peri‐implant bone changes in human dried cadaver mandibles.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02038.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Which device is more accurate to determine the stability/mobility of dental implants? A human cadaver study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tozum, T F" sort="Tozum, T F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="T. F." last="Tözüm">T. F. Tözüm</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bal, B T" sort="Bal, B T" uniqKey="Bal B" first="B. T." last="Bal">B. T. Bal</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" sort="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="I." last="Turkyilmaz">I. Turkyilmaz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gulay, G" sort="Gulay, G" uniqKey="Gulay G" first="G." last="Gülay">G. Gülay</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tulunoglu, I" sort="Tulunoglu, I" uniqKey="Tulunoglu I" first="I." last="Tulunoglu">I. Tulunoglu</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CCE43D8B9262749CDB44695088B5E685C44082C0</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02038.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CCE43D8B9262749CDB44695088B5E685C44082C0/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006587</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006587</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006587</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001A26</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001A26</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2010:Tozum T:which:device:is</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004F65</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004F24</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004F24</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Which device is more accurate to determine the stability/mobility of dental implants? A human cadaver study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tozum, T F" sort="Tozum, T F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="T. F." last="Tözüm">T. F. Tözüm</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">University</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bal, B T" sort="Bal, B T" uniqKey="Bal B" first="B. T." last="Bal">B. T. Bal</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" sort="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="I." last="Turkyilmaz">I. Turkyilmaz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, University of Texas Health Science at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Texas</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gulay, G" sort="Gulay, G" uniqKey="Gulay G" first="G." last="Gülay">G. Gülay</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tulunoglu, I" sort="Tulunoglu, I" uniqKey="Tulunoglu I" first="I." last="Tulunoglu">I. Tulunoglu</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="217">217</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="224">224</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-03">2010-03</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Analyzer</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Cable</term>
<term>Cable version</term>
<term>Cadaver</term>
<term>Capacity assessment</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin implant dent relat</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Comparative statistics</term>
<term>Defect</term>
<term>Dental implant</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Diameter implants</term>
<term>Different stability mobility measurement values</term>
<term>Extraction sockets</term>
<term>Hacettepe university</term>
<term>Human cadaver study</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant diameter</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implant stability quotient</term>
<term>Increment</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mobility</term>
<term>Mobility values</term>
<term>Natural teeth</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Osstell</term>
<term>Osstell mentor</term>
<term>Periimplant</term>
<term>Periodontol</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Previous mobility</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Resonance frequency</term>
<term>Resonance frequency analysis</term>
<term>Resonance frequency values</term>
<term>Sennerby</term>
<term>Stability</term>
<term>Stability mobility</term>
<term>Statistical correlations</term>
<term>Tozum</term>
<term>Turkyilmaz</term>
<term>Vertical defects</term>
<term>Wireless</term>
<term>Wireless analyzer</term>
<term>Wireless mobility</term>
<term>Wireless mobility values</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Analyzer</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Cable</term>
<term>Cable version</term>
<term>Cadaver</term>
<term>Capacity assessment</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin implant dent relat</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Comparative statistics</term>
<term>Defect</term>
<term>Dental implant</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Diameter implants</term>
<term>Different stability mobility measurement values</term>
<term>Extraction sockets</term>
<term>Hacettepe university</term>
<term>Human cadaver study</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant diameter</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implant stability quotient</term>
<term>Increment</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mobility</term>
<term>Mobility values</term>
<term>Natural teeth</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Osstell</term>
<term>Osstell mentor</term>
<term>Periimplant</term>
<term>Periodontol</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Previous mobility</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Resonance frequency</term>
<term>Resonance frequency analysis</term>
<term>Resonance frequency values</term>
<term>Sennerby</term>
<term>Stability</term>
<term>Stability mobility</term>
<term>Statistical correlations</term>
<term>Tozum</term>
<term>Turkyilmaz</term>
<term>Vertical defects</term>
<term>Wireless</term>
<term>Wireless analyzer</term>
<term>Wireless mobility</term>
<term>Wireless mobility values</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Summary  Non‐invasive devices including resonance frequency (RF) analysis and mobility measuring (MM) damping capacity assessment are used to measure implant stability/mobility. The aims of the study were to compare the primary stability of implant inserted into extraction sockets by using RF with cable, RF wireless and new wireless MM device, to clarify the relation between these devices and to understand the correlations between peri‐implant bone levels and implant stability. A total of 30 screw‐type implants (3·75 × 11 and 4·2 × 11 mm) were inserted into extraction sockets of eight mandibular pre‐molar regions of human cadavers. The primary stability of implants was measured by three devices after insertion. Peri‐implant vertical defects were created in millimetre increments ranging between 0 and 5 mm, and stability/mobility of implants were analysed. At placement, the mean implant stability quotient of RF with cable, RF wireless and MM device values was 46 ± 1, 57·8 ± 9 and −5·4 ± 1, respectively. Statistical correlations were demonstrated between these devices (P = 0·001). Statistically significant differences were presented for all peri‐implant detects ranging between 0 and 5 mm for RF with cable and RF wireless at all increments. However, only a significant decrease was found between 0 and 1 mm defects, and 4 and 5 mm defects in MM device. Although RF with cable and RF wireless seem to be suitable to detect peri‐implant bone loss around implants in 1 mm increments, the new MM device may not be suitable to detect the 1 mm peri‐implant bone changes in human dried cadaver mandibles.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Turquie</li>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Texas</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Tozum, T F" sort="Tozum, T F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="T. F." last="Tözüm">T. F. Tözüm</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Turquie">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Bal, B T" sort="Bal, B T" uniqKey="Bal B" first="B. T." last="Bal">B. T. Bal</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Gulay, G" sort="Gulay, G" uniqKey="Gulay G" first="G." last="Gülay">G. Gülay</name>
<name sortKey="Tulunoglu, I" sort="Tulunoglu, I" uniqKey="Tulunoglu I" first="I." last="Tulunoglu">I. Tulunoglu</name>
</country>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Texas">
<name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" sort="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="I." last="Turkyilmaz">I. Turkyilmaz</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004F24 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004F24 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:CCE43D8B9262749CDB44695088B5E685C44082C0
   |texte=   Which device is more accurate to determine the stability/mobility of dental implants? A human cadaver study
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022